Italiano
Analyze HTTP status, redirect chains, final destination, temporary redirects and unnecessary hops.
A redirect checker shows what happens between the requested URL and the final destination. For SEO, 301, 302, 307 and 308 redirects are not interchangeable: long chains, temporary statuses used for permanent migrations or final error pages can affect crawling, consolidation and signal transfer.
During a migration, the best redirect checker should show every hop, not only the final URL. This helps verify whether old pages, trailing-slash variants, HTTP, HTTPS, www and non-www versions land on the intended destination.
For permanent changes, 301 or 308 are usually the most coherent choices. 302 and 307 communicate temporary movement and can be valid in some cases, but they deserve review when one page permanently replaces another.
Each hop adds latency and complexity. A redirect chain is not always a severe issue, but on a large website it can make crawling less efficient and increase the risk of mixed technical signals.
After checking redirects, review canonical and indexability to confirm the final destination can be indexed. If the site uses HTTPS, the HSTS check helps verify the security side of the setup.
It checks the initial HTTP status, every hop in the redirect chain, the final URL and any errors. This confirms whether users and crawlers reach the intended destination directly.
A 301 normally communicates a permanent move, while a 302 indicates a temporary move. During a permanent migration, an accidental 302 can send a less consistent signal about which URL should be consolidated.
Not always, but every hop adds latency and complexity. Where possible, internal links and redirect rules should point directly to the valid final destination.
